Policy & Advocacy

Who Holds the Power to Change the System

Understanding which federal and Texas state officials control the levers of education policy and criminal justice reform — and why engaging them is essential to lasting change.

Why This Page Exists

Advocacy Requires Knowing Who to Reach

Systemic change does not happen by accident. It happens when advocates, educators, and community members understand exactly which officials hold authority over the policies that shape lives — and then engage those officials with evidence, persistence, and purpose.

This page is a resource for anyone working at the intersection of education equity and criminal justice reform. It identifies the key federal and Texas state policy makers whose decisions directly affect school funding, juvenile justice, reentry policy, and voting rights — and explains why each position matters.

Knowing who these decision-makers are, what authority they hold, and how to reach them is the first step toward holding them accountable.

— Joseph Baker

Federal Officials & Bodies

Federal Policy Makers

These federal officials and agencies set the national framework for education funding, civil rights enforcement, and criminal justice policy. Their decisions cascade down to every state and school district.

U.S. Secretary of Education

Why It Matters

Title I funding — the primary federal mechanism for supporting low-income schools — is administered through this office. Changes to Title I allocation formulas, accountability requirements, or school choice policy have immediate consequences for the communities Joseph Baker serves.

Title I and Title IV federal education fundingCivil rights enforcement in schools (OCR)Student loan and Pell Grant policyFederal accountability and testing standards

U.S. Attorney General

Why It Matters

The Civil Rights Division of the DOJ is the primary federal enforcer of voting rights protections and school desegregation orders. The AG's priorities determine whether federal civil rights law is actively enforced or allowed to atrophy.

Voting Rights Act enforcementFederal prison policy and Bureau of Prisons oversightCivil Rights Division prioritiesSchool desegregation compliance

U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary

Why It Matters

Major federal criminal justice reform — from the First Step Act to voting rights restoration — moves through this committee. Engaging committee members directly is essential for advocates seeking federal legislative change.

Federal sentencing and criminal justice reformJudicial nominations and confirmationsCivil rights and constitutional lawImmigration and border policy

U.S. House Committee on Education & the Workforce

Why It Matters

Reauthorization of ESSA, changes to Title I funding formulas, and expansion of Pell Grant eligibility to incarcerated students all originate in this committee. Advocates must engage members here to shape federal education policy.

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) reauthorizationTitle I and federal education funding formulasPell Grant eligibility for incarcerated studentsWorkforce development and vocational education

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights

Why It Matters

Commission reports on school discipline disparities, voting rights, and criminal justice have historically shaped federal policy conversations. Submitting testimony and research to the Commission is a direct pathway to federal policy influence.

Civil rights investigations and reportsPolicy recommendations to Congress and the PresidentPublic hearings on civil rights issuesState advisory committee oversight

Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)

Why It Matters

BJS data is the evidentiary foundation for criminal justice reform advocacy. Understanding how to read, cite, and challenge BJS data is essential for anyone making evidence-based arguments for policy change.

National crime and victimization statisticsRecidivism and reentry dataPrison and jail population reportsLaw enforcement and court statistics

Office of Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP)

Why It Matters

OJJDP grants fund the reentry programs, mentorship initiatives, and school-based intervention programs that Joseph Baker's advocacy supports. Federal funding priorities set here determine what resources are available at the community level.

Federal juvenile justice funding and grantsYouth reentry and diversion program standardsResearch on juvenile delinquency and preventionCompliance monitoring for juvenile facilities

Texas State Officials & Bodies

Texas State Policy Makers

These Texas officials and agencies control the state-level policies that most directly affect education equity and criminal justice in Texas — from school funding formulas to juvenile detention standards.

Texas Commissioner of Education

Why It Matters

TEA controls the funding formulas and accountability systems that determine resource allocation for Title I schools across Texas. The Commissioner's priorities directly shape what support is available to the students Joseph Baker's Empowerment Series serves.

Texas school funding formula administrationAccountability ratings for all Texas public schoolsTitle I and federal education fund distributionDistrict intervention and charter school oversight

Texas Senate Education Committee

Why It Matters

Texas school discipline reform — including changes to zero-tolerance policies that feed the school-to-prison pipeline — must pass through this committee. Engaging committee members is essential for advocates seeking state legislative change in education.

K–12 and higher education legislationSchool discipline and zero-tolerance policy reformTeacher certification and workforce standardsSchool finance and property tax policy

Texas House Public Education Committee

Why It Matters

School finance equity — ensuring that low-income and minority students receive adequate resources — is fought and won in this committee. Advocates must engage House members here alongside their Senate counterparts.

House education legislation and school financePublic school accountability and curriculumSpecial education and at-risk student programsEarly childhood education policy

Texas Board of Criminal Justice (TBCJ)

Why It Matters

TBCJ sets the policy framework for education and rehabilitation programs inside Texas prisons, including the Windham School District. Advocates seeking to expand prison education, improve reentry support, or reform disciplinary practices must engage this board.

TDCJ policy and operational oversightPrison education and rehabilitation program standardsReentry and parole policy frameworkWindham School District oversight

Texas Juvenile Justice Department (TJJD) Board

Why It Matters

TJJD facilities are among the primary venues for Joseph Baker's youth justice lectures. The board's policies on education access, disciplinary practices, and reentry support directly determine the environment in which that work happens.

Youth secure facility operations and standardsEducation and rehabilitation programs for incarcerated youthYouth reentry and aftercare policyDiversion program standards and funding

Texas Secretary of State

Why It Matters

Voting rights restoration for formerly incarcerated Texans — including accurate information about when voting rights are restored after completing a sentence — is administered through this office. Misinformation and administrative barriers to voting are civil rights issues that Joseph Baker's research directly addresses.

Voter registration and election administrationVoting rights restoration information for formerly incarcerated TexansElection integrity and security oversightCampaign finance disclosure

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB)

Why It Matters

THECB controls college access policy for formerly incarcerated students, including financial aid eligibility and dual-credit programs that create pathways from Title I high schools to higher education — the exact pipeline Joseph Baker's work is designed to build.

Texas Grant and state financial aid administrationCollege access policy for formerly incarcerated studentsDual-credit and early college program oversightPublic university accountability and funding formulas

Texas Senate Criminal Justice Committee

Why It Matters

State-level criminal justice reform — from sentencing reform to reentry program funding — moves through this committee. Advocates must engage committee members with research and testimony to advance evidence-based policy change.

Criminal sentencing and corrections legislationJuvenile justice reform and TJJD oversightReentry program funding and standardsLaw enforcement and public safety policy

Data & Sources

Research Behind the Reform

The figures below are drawn from government agencies, peer-reviewed research, and established policy organizations. All statistics should be verified directly from the primary sources listed — data is updated periodically by each agency. Joseph Baker's advocacy work is grounded in these sources and cross-referenced through NCRRRI research.

Texas Education — Dropout & Equity

TEA Dropout & Completion Reports

Annual statewide dropout rates, graduation cohort data, and at-risk student breakdowns by district and demographic.

Visit source →

TEA — Texas Academic Performance Reports (TAPR)

School and district accountability ratings, student performance data, and demographic breakdowns for all Texas public schools.

Visit source →

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)

State-by-state graduation rates, dropout data, and longitudinal education statistics for federal comparison.

Visit source →

Texas Criminal Justice & Recidivism

TDCJ Annual Statistical Report

Population data, recidivism rates, education program enrollment, and cost-per-incarceration figures for Texas state prisons.

Visit source →

Texas Juvenile Justice Department — Research & Statistics

Youth recidivism outcome reports, population data, and program effectiveness studies for the Texas juvenile justice system.

Visit source →

Windham School District Annual Performance Report

Education outcomes for incarcerated Texans — GED completion, vocational training, and post-release employment data.

Visit source →

Federal Research & Policy

Bureau of Justice Statistics — Survey of Prison Inmates

National data on educational attainment of incarcerated individuals, offense types, and demographic breakdowns.

Visit source →

RAND Corporation — Correctional Education Study

The most comprehensive meta-analysis of prison education effectiveness, documenting a 43% recidivism reduction and 5-to-1 ROI.

Visit source →

Alliance for Excellent Education

Research on the economic and social cost of high school dropouts, including the dropout-to-incarceration pipeline.

Visit source →

Sentencing Project — State-by-State Data

Felony disenfranchisement, racial disparities in sentencing, and state-level criminal justice reform tracking.

Visit source →

For Texas-specific cross-agency analysis, Joseph Baker's research through NCRRRI synthesizes TEA, TJJD, and TDCJ data with a civil rights and equity lens. Contact Joseph directly to request research briefs.

Take Action

Knowledge Is the First Step. Engagement Is the Next.

Understanding who holds power is only the beginning. Joseph Baker's advocacy work is built on the principle that informed communities can — and must — engage these officials directly. Whether through public testimony, legislative visits, voter education, or coalition building, every person has a role to play in shaping the policies that govern our schools and our justice system.